VA Intent to File Form
We made comments to VA's intent to file form, noting that VA should provide more clear guidance on how an ITF is used.
Document text
Page 1
Wesley A. McCauley
Admitted to the United States Court of
Appeal for Veterans Claims
Putting veterans and their families in charge ®
2025-December-16
VIA: DIRECT UPLOAD TO REGULATIONS.GOV
U.S Department of Veterans’ Affairs
Office of Information Technology, Data Governance and Analytics
c/o Dorothy Glasgow
Acting, VA PRA Clearance Officer
810 Vermont Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20420
Re: Public Comments Concerning
OMB Control No. 2900-0826
Dear Sir/Madame:
United Veteran’s Disability, LLC provides these comments in response
to the proposed collection of certain information by the VA concerning VA Form
21-0966, Intent to File a Claim for Compensation and/or Pension, or Survivor’s
Pension and/or DIC (“Intent to File” or “ITF”).
Wesley@unitedforvets.com 100 North Patterson Street
Phone: (229) 270-1571 Page 1 of 4 Suite 52
Unitedforvets.us Valdosta, Georgia 31601
Page 2
United Veteran’s Disability, LLC is a Veteran’s advocacy firm owned by
a VA accredited agent. Our office frequently provides representation before the
regional office, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals
for Veterans Claims. It is our practice to submit an ITF when we begin
representing a claimant before the VA.
Respectfully, we do not agree with VA’s decision to not revise the ITF
form in any way.
While the ITF is a vital tool for preserving effective dates, the current
instructions on the form fail to adequately inform Veterans of how the VA
applies an ITF to subsequent submissions. Specifically, the form does not
disclose that it is the VA’s policy of applying an active ITF to the next
received claim, regardless of whether that application is advantageous to the
Veteran.
Under current VA policy, an ITF is “consumed” by the first claim received
after the ITF is filed. Many Veterans are unaware that ancillary forms or
minor procedural filings may trigger this consumption. For example, a Veteran
may file an ITF anticipating a major claim for a high-value disability, such as
PTSD. If they subsequently file a minor claim, such as tinnitus, (or a form the
VA construes as a claim) before submitting the major claim, the ITF is applied
to that minor filing. Consequently, the major claim—filed later but still within
the one-year window—loses the earlier effective date. This lack of
transparency prevents Veterans from making informed strategic decisions
regarding the timing of their submissions.
Page 2 of 4
Page 3
Furthermore, VA’s ITF form should clearly notify Veterans that it is VA’s
policy to apply an ITF to a timely filed supplemental claim, even though such
serves no advantage whatsoever to the Veteran. Consider the following: A
Veteran files an ITF on January 1, 2025. On January 10, 2025, he is denied
service-connection for a lumbar condition. On March 1, 2025, the Veteran files
a supplemental claim of the January 10, 2025, lumbar denial. On July 1, 2025,
the Veteran files an original claim for a migraine condition.
In this example, it is VA’s policy to apply the ITF to the March 1, 2025,
supplemental claim, even though such serves no advantage to the Veteran,
since this was a continuously pursued claim. However, nothing in VA’s ITF
form would have notified the Veteran that this is VA’s current policy position
regarding ITFs, and that his effective date for the migraine claim could not be
January 1, 2025.
Lastly, the ITF form does not inform Veterans of the types of VA forms
VA views as a “triggering event” for purposes of an ITF. For example, VA Form
21-2680 or VA Form 21-8940 would all consume an ITF, but Veterans are not
given any notice of this in the ITF form itself.
To ensure Veterans are fully informed of the procedural consequences of
submitting various VA forms, we proposed an amendment to the ITF form by
adding a section titled “Notice to Claimant.” We offer the following sample
language:
Notice to Claimant: The VA will apply this Intent to File to the first
claim received after this form is submitted to the VA. Once applied
to a claim, this Intent to File is considered ‘used’ and cannot be used
Page 3 of 4
Page 4
for subsequent claims, even if those later claims are filed within the
one-year period. VA considers the following forms to ‘use’ your
Intent to File: VA Form 21-526EZ, VA Form 20-0995, VA Form 21-
8940, and VA Form 21-2680.
By implementing these changes, the VA will significantly improve
transparency and assist Veterans in navigating the complexities of the claims
process. Providing clear notice of how an ITF is utilized aligns with the VA’s
mission to be Veteran-centric and ensures that benefits are awarded with the
earliest possible effective dates intended by the claimant.
Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Should you require
additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Godspeed,
Wesley A. McCauley
Chief Executive Officer
POA I9A; Accreditation Number 50884
“The veterans benefit system is designed to award ‘entitlements to a
special class of citizens, those who risked harm to serve and defend their
country’. This entire scheme is imbued with special beneficence from a grateful
sovereign”, Barrett v. Principi 363 F.3d 1316, 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2004).
Page 4 of 4